第四次作業

sometimes,preliminary results that capture news headlines are controversial because they have not been widely tested and accepted by peer review. they are not yet considered reliable,and can be thought of as tentative science oy frontier science. some of these results will be validated and classified as reliable and some will be discredited and classified as unreliable. at the frontier stage,it is normal for scientists to disagree about the meaning and accuracy of data and the validity of hypotheses and results. this is how scientific knowledge advances.
有時，初步的結果，新聞標題的捕捉是有爭議，因為他們還沒有得到廣泛的測試和接受同行審查。他們還沒有可靠，並且可以被認為是試探性科學前沿科學。這些結果將驗證和歸類為可靠和一些將名譽掃地，歸類為不可靠的。在邊境的階段，這是正常的科學家不同意的含義和數據的準確性和有效性的假設和結果。這是科學知識的進步